pinkowim's Xanga Site - 11/14/2004 10:39:40 AM

horrible
absolutely horrible
if i showed pagz this he would definetely lower his "a"
he is defiling, disrespecting, and disgracing the word "constant"
constant never varies, correct?
so he is asserting that his value (even if he does admit it could be off a little) applies to all cities EXACTLY by calling it a constant.
regaurdless of whether or not it has been proven, is provable, or is correct, it is an incorrect use of the word "constant"

anyway, even if the word "constant" is used correctly, i have two more problems.
the simplest being that the # of criminals cannot be measured (esp. with his def. which includes small "crimes" like copyright violation). so many get away with it.
secondly, the difference of criminal rate in the US among cities is huge.

OHH a third. he says there are only about 30 criminals in larchmont. (since he cited it as an example) with his very large definition of a criminal, there has got to be more small criminals than 30. Heck, even speeding is a crime by his def! and there has got to be more than 30 © violators